Gayatri Solution Group
(Follow Us :- Google +, Yahoo Group, GSG Blog, GSG Website,)
Knowledge Bank
Iomega ZIP-100 Drive Logo
An internal Zip drive installed in a computer
An internal Zip drive outside of a computer
The Zip disk media
The Zip drive is a medium-capacity removable disk storage system that was introduced by Iomega in late 1994. Originally, Zip disks launched with capacities of 100 MB, but later versions increased this to first 250 MB and then 750 MB.
The format became the most popular of the super-floppy type products which filled a niche in the late 1990s portable storage market. However it was never popular enough to replace the 3.5-inch floppy disk nor could ever match the storage size available on rewritable CDs and later rewritable DVDs. USB flash drives ultimately proved to be the better rewritable storage medium among the general public due to the near-ubiquity of USB ports on personal computers and soon after because of the far greater storage sizes offered. Zip drives fell out of favor for mass portable storage during the early 2000s. The Zip brand later covered internal and external CD writers known as Zip-650 or Zip-CD, which had no relation to the Zip drive.
This resulted in a disk that had all of the 3½" floppy's convenience, but held much more data, with performance that was much improved over a standard floppy drive (though not directly competitive with hard disk drives). However, Zip disk housings were much thicker than those of floppy disks.[2] The original Zip drive had a maximum data transfer rate of about 1 megabyte/second (comparable to 6× CD-R; although some connection methods were slower, down to approximately 50 kB/second for maximum-compatibility parallel "nibble" mode) and a seek time of 28 milliseconds on average, compared to a standard 1.44 MB floppy's typical 500 kbit/s (62.5 kB/s) transfer rate and several-hundred-millisecond average seek time. Typical desktop hard disk drives from mid-to-late 1990s revolved at 5400 rpm and had transfer rates from 3 MB/s to 10 MB/s or more, and average seek times from 20 ms to 14 ms or less.
Early-generation Zip drives were in direct competition with the SuperDisk or LS-120 drives, which held 20% more data and could also read standard 3½" 1.44 MB diskettes, but they had a lower data-transfer rate due to lower rotational speed.[3] The rivalry was over before the dawn of the USB era.
Later (USB, left) and earlier (parallel, right) Zip drives (media in foreground).
Zip drives are available in multiple interfaces including:
Early external SCSI-based Zip drives often came with an included SCSI adapter known as Zip Zoom. The Zip Zoom is a rebadged ISA Adaptec SCSI host controller. Also, originally sold separately was a PCMCIA-to-SCSI adapter for laptop compatibility, also a rebadged Adaptec.
Interface availability:
Driver support:
The retroreflective spot differs on the three media sizes such that if a larger disk is inserted in a smaller-capacity drive, the disk is immediately ejected again without any attempt being made to access the disk.
Zip Disk and Drive sales, 1998 to 2003
Sales of Zip drives and disks declined steadily from 1999 to 2003.[7] Zip disks had a relatively high cost per megabyte compared to the falling costs of then-new CD-R and CD-RW discs.
The growth of hard disk drives to multi-gigabyte capacity made backing up with Zip disks less economical. Furthermore, the advent of inexpensive recordable CD and DVD drives for computers, followed by USB flash drives, pushed the Zip drive out of the mainstream market. Ironically, CDs and DVDs are now facing the same fate. Nevertheless, during their prime, Zip disks greatly eased the exchange of files that were too big to fit into a standard 3.5" floppy or an email attachment, and there was no high-speed connection to transfer the file to the recipient. However, the advantages of magnetic media over optical media and flash memory, in terms of long-term file storage stability and high erase/rewrite cycles, still affords them a niche in the data-storage arena. In such applications, Zip used to compete primarily with USB external hard drives and the Hi-MD version of Sony's MiniDisc, which stores up to 1 GB on a disk that is smaller and less expensive than a 100 MB Zip disk.
In September 1998, a class action suit was brought against Iomega over a type of Zip drive failure dubbed the "Click of Death".[citation needed]
In 2006, PC World rated the Zip drive as the 15th worst technology product of all time.[8] However, in 2007, PC World rated the Zip drive as the 23rd best technology product of all time.[9]
Iomega used the DirectCD software from Adaptec to allow UDF drive-letter access to CD-R or CD-RW media.
The company also released their own CD-R and CD-RW media under the same ZipCD name. However, the ZipCD drives would burn to any blank CD-R or CD-RW media.
Early models of ZipCD drives were rebadged Philips drives, which were also so unreliable that a class action lawsuit succeeded.[10]
The ZipCD 650 was able to record onto 700 MB CDs but could only burn data up to 650 MB. There was a third-party firmware that forced the ZipCD 650 to be able to write data CDs up to 700 MB
Source :- http://simple.wikipedia.org,http://greatinformer.blogspot.in,
(Follow Us :- Google +, Yahoo Group, GSG Blog, GSG Website,)
Knowledge Bank
Zip Drive
Zip Drive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article relies on references to primary sources. (February 2010) |
The format became the most popular of the super-floppy type products which filled a niche in the late 1990s portable storage market. However it was never popular enough to replace the 3.5-inch floppy disk nor could ever match the storage size available on rewritable CDs and later rewritable DVDs. USB flash drives ultimately proved to be the better rewritable storage medium among the general public due to the near-ubiquity of USB ports on personal computers and soon after because of the far greater storage sizes offered. Zip drives fell out of favor for mass portable storage during the early 2000s. The Zip brand later covered internal and external CD writers known as Zip-650 or Zip-CD, which had no relation to the Zip drive.
Overview
The Zip drive is similar to Iomega's earlier Bernoulli Box in that in both drives, a set of read/write heads mounted on a linear actuator hover over a rapidly spinning flexible medium mounted in a sturdy cartridge. However, the Zip cartridge lacks the Bernoulli plate of the earlier product,[1] and as a consequence, the Zip cartridge has only one disk in the cartridge in contrast to the two disks in a Bernoulli cartridge (one on either side of the Bernoulli plate). In the Zip drive, the heads fly in a manner similar to a hard disk drive, without the use of the Bernoulli effect. The linear actuator uses the voice coil actuation technology related to modern hard disk drives. The Zip disk uses smaller media (about the size of a 9 cm (3½") microfloppy, but more ruggedised, rather than the Compact Disc-sized Bernoulli media), and a simplified drive design that reduced its overall cost.This resulted in a disk that had all of the 3½" floppy's convenience, but held much more data, with performance that was much improved over a standard floppy drive (though not directly competitive with hard disk drives). However, Zip disk housings were much thicker than those of floppy disks.[2] The original Zip drive had a maximum data transfer rate of about 1 megabyte/second (comparable to 6× CD-R; although some connection methods were slower, down to approximately 50 kB/second for maximum-compatibility parallel "nibble" mode) and a seek time of 28 milliseconds on average, compared to a standard 1.44 MB floppy's typical 500 kbit/s (62.5 kB/s) transfer rate and several-hundred-millisecond average seek time. Typical desktop hard disk drives from mid-to-late 1990s revolved at 5400 rpm and had transfer rates from 3 MB/s to 10 MB/s or more, and average seek times from 20 ms to 14 ms or less.
Early-generation Zip drives were in direct competition with the SuperDisk or LS-120 drives, which held 20% more data and could also read standard 3½" 1.44 MB diskettes, but they had a lower data-transfer rate due to lower rotational speed.[3] The rivalry was over before the dawn of the USB era.
Interfaces
- IDE True ATA (very early ATA internal Zip drives mostly sold to OEMs; these drives exhibit software compatibility issues because they do not support the ATAPI command set)
- ATAPI (all Zip generations)
- USB 1.1 (Zip 100 MB and 250 MB generations)
- USB 2.0 (Zip 750 MB generation; backwards compatible with USB 1.1 systems)
- IEEE 1284 (Parallel Port) with Printer passthrough (Zip 100 MB and 250 MB generations) (See NB 1)
- IEEE 1394 (Firewire) (Zip 250 MB and 750 MB generations)
- SCSI (Zip 100 MB and 250 MB generations; both internal and external editions; external editions limited to ID 5 and 6)
- "Plus" (Zip 100 MB external drive with both SCSI and IEEE 1284 connections; SCSI ID limited to ID 5 and 6).
Early external SCSI-based Zip drives often came with an included SCSI adapter known as Zip Zoom. The Zip Zoom is a rebadged ISA Adaptec SCSI host controller. Also, originally sold separately was a PCMCIA-to-SCSI adapter for laptop compatibility, also a rebadged Adaptec.
Interface availability:
| Name | Interface | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATAPI | SCSI | LPT[note 1] | USB | FireWire[note 2] | |
| Zip 100 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Zip 250 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Zip 750 | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes |
|
|||||
- Microsoft Windows family
- Some Linux / BSD etc. (not universal)
- Oracle Solaris 8,9,10,11
- IBM OS/2
- Macintosh System 6.x,(See NB 1) 7.1–7.5, and Mac OS 7.6–9.2
- Mac OS X
BIOS support
Some modern BIOSes still support booting to Zip drives via the USB or ATAPI interfaces.Compatibility
Higher-capacity Zip disks must be used in a drive with at least the same capacity ability. Higher-capacity drives can read lower-capacity media. The 250 MB drive writes much more slowly to 100 MB disks than the 100 MB drive, and the Iomega software is unable to perform a "long" (thorough) format on a 100 MB disk (they can be formatted in Windows as normal; the advantage of the Iomega software is that it can format the disks with a slightly higher capacity). The 750 MB drive cannot write to 100 MB disks but can read existing disks.The retroreflective spot differs on the three media sizes such that if a larger disk is inserted in a smaller-capacity drive, the disk is immediately ejected again without any attempt being made to access the disk.
Sales, problems, and licensing
Zip drives initially sold well after their introduction in 1994, owing to their low price and high (for the time) capacity. The drive was initially sold for just under US$200 with one cartridge included, and additional 100 MB cartridges for US$20. At this time hard disks typically had a capacity of 500 MB and cost around US$200, and so backing up with Zip disks was very economical for home users—some computer suppliers such as Dell and Apple Inc. included Iomega internal Zip drives with their machines. Zip drives also made significant inroads in the graphic arts market, as a cheaper alternative to the Syquest cartridge hard disk system. The price of additional cartridges swiftly dropped further over the next few years, as more companies began supplying them. Eventually, the suppliers included Fujifilm, Verbatim, Toshiba and Maxell. Epson and NEC also produced a licensed 100 MB drive model with its brand name.
The growth of hard disk drives to multi-gigabyte capacity made backing up with Zip disks less economical. Furthermore, the advent of inexpensive recordable CD and DVD drives for computers, followed by USB flash drives, pushed the Zip drive out of the mainstream market. Ironically, CDs and DVDs are now facing the same fate. Nevertheless, during their prime, Zip disks greatly eased the exchange of files that were too big to fit into a standard 3.5" floppy or an email attachment, and there was no high-speed connection to transfer the file to the recipient. However, the advantages of magnetic media over optical media and flash memory, in terms of long-term file storage stability and high erase/rewrite cycles, still affords them a niche in the data-storage arena. In such applications, Zip used to compete primarily with USB external hard drives and the Hi-MD version of Sony's MiniDisc, which stores up to 1 GB on a disk that is smaller and less expensive than a 100 MB Zip disk.
In September 1998, a class action suit was brought against Iomega over a type of Zip drive failure dubbed the "Click of Death".[citation needed]
In 2006, PC World rated the Zip drive as the 15th worst technology product of all time.[8] However, in 2007, PC World rated the Zip drive as the 23rd best technology product of all time.[9]
Legacy
Zip drives are still used today by retro-computing enthusiasts as a means to transfer large amounts (compared to the retro hardware) of data between modern and older computer systems. The Commodore-Amiga, Atari ST, Apple II, and "old world" Macintosh communities often use drives with the SCSI interface prevalent on those platforms. They have also found a small niche in the music production community, as SCSI-compatible Zip drives can be used with vintage samplers and keyboards of the '90s.ZipCD
Iomega also produced a line of internal and external recordable CD drives under the Zip brand in the late 1990s, called the ZipCD 650. It used regular CD-R media and had no format relation to the magnetic Zip drive. The external models were installed in a Zip-drive-style case, and used standard USB 1.1 connections.Iomega used the DirectCD software from Adaptec to allow UDF drive-letter access to CD-R or CD-RW media.
The company also released their own CD-R and CD-RW media under the same ZipCD name. However, the ZipCD drives would burn to any blank CD-R or CD-RW media.
Early models of ZipCD drives were rebadged Philips drives, which were also so unreliable that a class action lawsuit succeeded.[10]
The ZipCD 650 was able to record onto 700 MB CDs but could only burn data up to 650 MB. There was a third-party firmware that forced the ZipCD 650 to be able to write data CDs up to 700 MB
Source :- http://simple.wikipedia.org,http://greatinformer.blogspot.in,
Products :- CPU, Motherboard, RAM, HDD, LCD
– LED, Keyboard, Mouse, DVD Writer, SMPS, Speaker, Battery, Adapter, Cooling
Pad, Screen Guard, Bag, Internet Dongles, Blank CD – DVD, Pen drive, Web
Camera, Microphone, Headphone, External CD Drive, Cables, Projector, Scanner,
Printer, Education CD - DVD etc…
More Products List Click Here
More Products List Click Here
Note
:- Purchase any products just email inquiry.gsg13@gmail.com
Published
By :-
Gayatri Solution Group
{ Jayesh
Patel} (Live In
:- Gujarat)
No comments:
Post a Comment